scientific conference of lau
Title Personality Correlates of Personnel Organizational Loyalty
Author Inna S. Krutko, Olga S. Chalikova
About the author
DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-E02
Section Economics & Economy
Year Index UDK 331.1:331.108.26 Pages 129–140
Abstract The phenomenon of personnel organizational loyalty as a key organizational asset is considered from the perspective of its level, conditions of development and correlates. The problem of loyalty is viewed in the context of the following components: emotional, cognitive and behavioral. The focus group method was used to describe the cohort behavior characteristic of various loyalty levels and obtain the competence model. General loyalty level was subsequently assessed with Organizational Commitment Scale (OCS) and K. V. Kharsky’s Loyalty Manifestation Observation Sheet methods recognized as the average one in organizations of various profiles. Correlations with employees’ personal features are described through the individual typological questionnaire by L. N. Sobchik, J. Rotter’s I-E Scale, and R. M. Belbin’s Team Roles. Certain personality traits are identified that can be viewed as universal personality correlates of loyalty. Employees’ dominant motives are identified as “Satisfaction from Achieving a Goal, an Outcome” and “Communication with Colleagues”. The only loyalty correlate related to implementation of innovations is identified – readiness to follow a leader. The higher the loyalty, the better competitive motive and the motive of feeling one’s usefulness are manifested. In terms of innovations, the following types are identified at the organization: “Readiness Based on Positive Emotional Attitude to Everything New” and “Readiness on Condition of Personal and Professional Fulfillment”; consequently, employees support changes, but only at the first stages of implementation. Presumably, several psychological mechanisms shaping loyalty based on traits like aggressiveness, rigidity and anxiety (sensitivity, lability) exist. It is proven that loyalty correlates are conditioned rather by the enterprise type and its HR policy than universal characteristics. However, the trend of a dependency between aggressiveness as a personal trait and one’s loyal attitude to the organization is manifested at enterprises from various fields.
Keywords
  • personnel loyalty
  • personality correlates
  • organizational loyalty
For citation Krutko IS, Chalikova OS. Personality Correlates of Personnel Organizational Loyalty. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 129–140. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-E02.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
References
  • 1. Agatova LA, Smolyan GL, Solntseva GN. Neloyal’nost’ personala kak ugroza bezopasnosti organizatsii [Lack of Personnel Loyalty as a Threat to Organizational Safety]. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Proceeding of the Institute for Systems Analysis of the Russian Academy of Science. 2007;31: 216–229. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Andryushchenko OV. Loyal’nost’ v organizatsiyakh: teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspekt [Loyalty in Organizations: Theoretical and Methodology Aspect]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2011. 20 p. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Busygina IS. Korporativnaya bezopasnost’ i «samost’» organizatsii: akmeologicheskii podkhod [Organizational Corporate Security and “Selfhood”: Acmeological Approach]. Mir psikhologii = World of Psychology. 2010;5: 240–251. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Dominiak VI. Organizatsionnaya loyal’nost’: model’ realizatsii ozhidanii rabotnika ot svoei organizatsii [Organizational Loyalty: Model of Meeting Worker’s Expectations from their Organization]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University; 2006. 281 p. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Dotsenko EL. Izmerenie priverzhennosti personala kompanii s pomoshch’yu oprosnoi metodiki [Measuring Company Staff Commitment with Survey Method]. In: Psikhologiya biznesa: upravlenie personalom v gosudarstvennykh organizatsiyakh i kommercheskikh strukturakh [Psychology of Business: HR Management in Public Organizations and Commercial Structures]: Proceedings of the 4th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Saint Petersburg: Imaton; 2001. 211 p. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Legostayeva ES, Chalikova OS, Arkhipova VA. Vzaimosvyaz’ osobennostei intellekta i akademicheskoi uspevaemosti u studentov razlichnykh psikhologicheskikh tipov [Relation Between Intellectual Features and Academic Performance in Students of Various Psychological Types]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2019;6: 138–143. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Magura MI, Kurbatova MB. Sovremennye personal-tekhnologii. Gl. 9 : Organizatsionnaya priverzhennost’ [Contemporary Personnel Technologies. Chapter 9: Organizational Commitment]. Upravlenie personalom = HR Management. 2001;6: 45–50. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Ovchinnikova OG. Loyal’nost’ personala [Personnel Loyalty]. Moscow: Upravleniye personalom; 2006. p. 96–101. (In Russ.).
  • 9. Sidorenko EV. Razvitie organizatsionnoi priverzhennosti [Organizational Commitment Development]. Moscow: Arsenal Managers School; 2004. 42 p. (In Russ.).
  • 10. Stavropoltseva EA. Formirovanie organizatsionnoi loyal’nosti studentov vuzov [Building Organizational Loyalty in College Students]. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University; 2013. 24 p. (In Russ.).
  • 11. Starodubtseva GA. Psikhosemanticheskie sostavlyayushchie organizatsionnoi loyal’nosti [Psycho-Semantic Components of Organizational Loyalty]. Yaroslavl: P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University; 2012. 26 p. (In Russ.).
  • 12. Kharsky K. Blagonadezhnost’ i loyal’nost’ personala [Personnel Trustworthiness and Loyalty]. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2003. 496 p. (In Russ.).
  • 13. Chumarin IG. Lyudi i organizatsii: destruktivnoe protivodeistvie [People and Organizations: Destructive Counteraction]. In: Lyudi i organizatsii [People and Organizations]: Collection of Abstracts of the Third All-Russian Conference. Saint Petersburg: Imaton-М; 2000. p. 63–64. (In Russ.).
  • 14. Allen NJ. Organizational Commitment in the Military: A Discussion of Theory and Practice. Military Psychology. 2003;15: 237–253.
  • 15. Goman CK. The New Loyalty Compact: Organization-Employee Loyalty is Reborn. Linkage Incorporated; 2006.
  • 16. Kanter RM, Klein N. Wainwright Industries (A): Beyond the Baldrige. Harvard Business School Cases. 1996;1: 1–15.
  • 17. Wang Y. Observations on the organizational commitment of Chinese employees: comparative studies of state-owned enterprises and foreign invested enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2004;15: 649–669.
Funding
Submitted 06.08.2019
Accepted 10.09.2019