scientific conference of lau
Title Comprehensive Method of Assessing Legislative Compliance with the Principle of Equity as Exemplified by Tax Relations
Author Anton N. Rundkvist
About the author
DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-L03
Section Law
Year Index UDK 340:336.2.027 Pages 168–176
Abstract This research is devoted to the issue of assessing the effective legislation from the perspective of the legal principle of equity. The author proposes to define the latter as the only super-principle of its kind based on the concept of public welfare. Based on this approach, a comprehensive method of assessing legislation is developed, involving a profound analysis of the content of legislative regulations, as well as their actual implementation in practice from the perspective of compliance with legal principles and legal axioms. The conclusion is made that regulations will not comply with the principle of equity criterion if their content or the result of their practical implementation enables departure from other legal principles, and such departure is neither necessary nor justified and causes obvious legal imbalance misaligned with the public welfare concept or directly contradicting legal axioms. The outlined principle was applied to analyze the effective tax legislation of the Russian Federation, which led the author to the conclusion that the taxation system existing in Russia nowadays is incapable of satisfying a series of requirements dictated by the fundamental legal principles of taxation (proportionality, certainty, convenience, transparency, presumption of good faith and practicality), lacking a clear and accurate justification of departing from such requirements and, consequently, the need for radical reformation of the tax legislation of the Russian Federation to bring the latter in compliance with the legal principle of equity.
  • equity
  • principle of equity
  • tax law
  • legal principles
  • legal axioms
  • public welfare
For citation Rundkvist AN. Comprehensive Method of Assessing Legislative Compliance with the Principle of Equity as Exemplified by Tax Relations. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 168–176. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-L03.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
  • 1. Alexeenko MM. Vzglyad na razvitie ucheniya o naloge u ekonomistov A. Smita, Zh.-B. Seya, D. Rikardo, Zh. Sismondi i Dzh. St. Millya [A View on the Development of Tax Teachings by Economists A. Smith, J.-B. Say, D. Ricardo, J. de Sismondi and J. S. Mill]. 2nd ed. Moscow: URSS; 2012. 44 p. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Arendarenko AV. Obshchepravovoi printsip sotsial’noi spravedlivosti i ego realizatsiya v sovremennom ugolovnom prave Rossii: teoretiko-pravovye aspekty [General Legal Principle of Social Justice and its Implementation in the Contemporary Russian Criminal Law: Theoretical and Legal Aspects]. Moscow: MGIMO University; 2009. 46 p. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Galaktionov SA. Prinip spravedlivosti (ugolovno-pravovoi aspekt) [Principle of Equity (Criminal Law Aspect)]. Ryazan: Academy of Law and Management; 2014. 25 p. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Gorodnova ON. Ideya spravedlivosti kak kriterii otsenki i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva: teoreticheskii i prikladnoi aspekty [Idea of Equity as a Criterion for Assessment and Improvement of Criminal Law: Theoretical and Applied Aspect]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod academy of the Ministry of internal affairs of Russia; 2014. 32 p. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Ezeeva IR. Nekotorye problemy nalogovogo neravenstva [Some Problems of Tax Inequality]. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation. 2013;7: 521–524. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Kuznetsov VP. O mnimosti polozhenii abzatsa vtorogo p. 2 st. 22 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On Ostensibility of Provisions of the Second Sub-Paragraph, Par. 2, Article 22 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation]. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation. 2010;1: 14–18. Available from: [Accessed 23.01.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Maslennikov AV. Pravovye aksiomy [Legal Axioms]. Vladimir: Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service; 2006. 26 p. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Mirza LS. Iustitia (pravosudie i spravedlivost’ v ugolovnom protsesse) [Iustitia (Justice and Equity in Criminal Proceedings)]. Lex Russica = Lex Russica. 2008;67(1): 54–71. (In Russ.).
  • 9. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of October 24, 1996 No. 17-P. On the Case of Verifying Constitutionality of Part 1, Art. 2 of Federal Law of March 7, 1996 “On Introducing Changes in the Law of the Russian Federation ‘On Excise Taxes’”. Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF = Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. 1996;5. (In Russ.).
  • 10. Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Moscow: Sotsekgiz; 1962. 684 p. (In Russ.).
  • 11. Vogel К. Konstitutsionnye osnovy finansovogo prava [Constitutional Foundations of Financial Law]. In: Gosudarstvennoe pravo Germanii : v 2 t. T. 2 [State Law of Germany: in 2 vol. Vol. 2]. Moscow: IGPAN; 1994. p. 112–133. (In Russ.).
  • 12. Yunusov SA. Printsip spravedlivosti v ugolovno-ispolnitel’nom prave: vopros teorii [Principle of Equity in Criminal and Penal Law: A Theoretical Issue]. Ryazan: Academy of Law and Management; 2014. 23 p. (In Russ.).
Submitted 24.06.2019
Accepted 02.09.2019