scientific conference of lau
Title The Archetype of the Home in the Context of Ethnic Identity and Security Issues
Author Elena N. Syutkina, Lyudmila V. Tarasova, Olga S. Solodukhina, Nataliya A. Belousova
About the author


DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-SP05
Section Social Psychology
Year Index UDK [159.9+614.8]:159.922.4:159.923.2 Pages 268–275
Abstract Radical changes in socio-political, economic, and cultural landscape destroying the stability and sustainability of human existence stir the need for seeking fundamentals of this stability which lies in the bowels of the collective unconscious and reside in the archetypical matrices. One of the basic archetypes is the archetype of the home, and it underpins the formation of basic security and human identity. The identification of functional characteristics and levels of this archetypal construct may be of interest to the problems of security and ethnic identity. The exploration of these issues requires a reference to particular concepts of sociopsychological, cultural-and-historic, socio-cultural, axiological, and socio-philosophical approaches to studying the psychological and cultural phenomenon. The treatment of security and ethnic identity’ issues is linked to studying the substance of a defensive and identifying function of the home archetype which symbolically realizes itself as a mythological, and a social, and an architectural, as a geographical, and as ethnic space. The home archetype actualization manifests itself in the unconscious aspiration to successful searches of a secure living space which becomes a reference point for the subject’s awareness of his place in the world. If the influence of archetypal home reduces, people no longer feel their belonging to any place or community, and their sense of social responsibility weakens, too.
Keywords
  • archetype
  • home archetype
  • security and ethnic identity
For citation Syutkina EN, Tarasova LV, Solodukhina OS, Belousova NA. The Archetype of the Home in the Context of Ethnic Identity and Security Issues. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 268–275. Available from: doi: 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-SP05.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
References
  • 1. Bashlyar G. Dom ot pogreba do cherdaka. Smysl zhilishcha [The house from basement to attic. The meaning of housing]. Logos = Logos. 2002;3(34): 109–135. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Bulgakov S. Natsiya i chelovechestvo [The nation and humankind]. Novyi grad = The New City. 1934;8: 28–38. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Vaganyan GA, Vaganyan VG, Bagdasaryan VF. Kognitivnye aspekty kontsepta «Dom» [Cognitive aspects of the concept “House”]. 2017. Available from: http://www.iatp.am/vahanyan/articles/tun-2017-ru.pdf [Accessed 01.07.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Gritskov YV, L’vov DV. Vzaimodeistvie arkhetipov korporativnosti i ierarkhii v protsesse stanovleniya vnutrigruppovoi obshchnosti [The interaction of corporativism and hierarchy’ archetypes in intra-group commonality building]. Zhurnal SFU. Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki = SibFU Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2015;11: 2325–2330. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Klimova SV. Sotsial’no-filosofskie aspekty analiza arkhetipicheskikh funktsii doma [Socio-philosophical aspects of analyzing archetypic functions of the house]. 2006. Available from: http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/klimova-sv/socialno-filosofskie-aspekty-analiza-arhetipicheskih-funkciy-doma [Accessed 01.07.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Campbell J. Geroi s tysyach’yu litsami [The Hero with a Thousand Faces]. Kiev: Sofiya; 1997. 336 p. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Lurie SV. Utoptannaya tropa skvoz’ temnyi les (Bessoznatel’noe v etnicheskoi kartine mira) [Trampled Path Through the Dark Forest (Unconsious in the Ethnic Picture of the World)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ = Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2016;2: 136–143. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Petrova M. Obraz doma v fol’klore i mife [The image of the house in folklore and myth]. In: Volodina LV, Prozersky VV, Ustyugova EN, Yurovskaya EP (eds.) Estetika segodnya: sostoyanie, perspektivy [Aesthetics Today: status and prospects]: proceedings of the scientific conference, 20–21, October 1999, St.-Petersburg. St.-Petersburg: The St.-Petersburg Philosophical Society; 1999. Vol. 1. p. 59–61. (In Russ.).
  • 9. Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii. Arkhetipy i povtoryaemost’ [The myth of the eternal return. Archetypes and recurrence]. St.-Petersburg: Aleteiya; 1998. 256 p. (In Russ.).
  • 10. Yung CG. Arkhetip i simvol [Archetypes and symbols]. Moscow: Renessans; 1991. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  • 11. Zinchenko YP, Perelygina EB. Secure City: Social-psychological Aspects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;86: 104–109.
Funding Тhe article was supported with a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project № 18-18-00112).
Submitted 10.08.2019
Accepted 12.09.2019