|Title||A Study into Psychological Mindedness in Relation to Different Types of Reflection|
|Author||Olesya V. Putilova, Olga S. Vindeker, Tat’yana L. Smorkalova|
|About the author||
Olesya V. Putilova – psychologist and a graduate of Department of Psychology, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Olga S. Vindeker – Сand. Sci. (Psychology), associate professor, associate professor at Pedagogy and Psychology chair, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Tat’yana L. Smorkalova – Сand. Sci. (Psychology), associate professor at General and Applied Psychology chair of Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
|Abstract||The paper describes the results of the empirical study into psychological mindedness in relation to different types of reflection. The relevance of the paper is determined by the necessity to explore such human psychological characteristics that contribute to successful adaptation in the world of information abundance, uncertainty and inconsistency. The consistency between tolerance towards uncertainty and openness to change, on the one hand, and an interest in subjective experiences (own and others’ experiences), interest in internal processes, on the other, was called psychological mindedness. Initially, this concept was used in the framework of a clinical approach due to the necessity to examine the psychological factors of group and individual therapy effectiveness. Later it became clear that psychological mindedness could be a reliable predictor of an individual’s success in different lines of work. In Russia, this construct is under-researched. That is why this given study aimed to collect empirical data on the linkage between psychological mindedness and the highest adaptive type of reflection on a sample of Russian testees. The sample consisted of 149 respondents aged 18 – 65. Methods exploited in the study included Psychological Mindedness Scale by H. R. Conte (adapted by M. A. Novikova and T. V. Kornilova) and Differential Test of Reflexivity by D. A. Leont’ev, et al. The obtained data have confirmed the hypothesis of a connection between psychological mindedness and the systemic reflection. A positive correlation between one of the aspects of psychological mindedness – an interest in the sphere of subjective experiences – and introspection and quasi-reflection was found. Introspection as one of ineffective forms of reflection is negatively linked to the most important parameter of psychological mindedness – subjective availability of experiences for comprehension and analysis. In the course of correlation analysis the specificity of interrelations between psychological mindedness and types of reflection in women, men and mixed-age groups was revealed. The obtained data allow for clarifying the concept of psychological mindedness and differentially carrying out further studies on mixed-age and gender groups.|
|For citation||Putilova OV, Vindeker OS, Smorkalova TL. A Study into Psychological Mindedness in Relation to Different Types of Reflection. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 276–285. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-SP06.|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|Full text version of the article||Article language||russian|