scientific conference of lau
Title A Study into Psychological Mindedness in Relation to Different Types of Reflection
Author Olesya V. Putilova, Olga S. Vindeker, Tat’yana L. Smorkalova
About the author

DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-SP06
Section Social Psychology
Year Index UDK 316.61:303.425.2 Pages 276–285
Abstract The paper describes the results of the empirical study into psychological mindedness in relation to different types of reflection. The relevance of the paper is determined by the necessity to explore such human psychological characteristics that contribute to successful adaptation in the world of information abundance, uncertainty and inconsistency. The consistency between tolerance towards uncertainty and openness to change, on the one hand, and an interest in subjective experiences (own and others’ experiences), interest in internal processes, on the other, was called psychological mindedness. Initially, this concept was used in the framework of a clinical approach due to the necessity to examine the psychological factors of group and individual therapy effectiveness. Later it became clear that psychological mindedness could be a reliable predictor of an individual’s success in different lines of work. In Russia, this construct is under-researched. That is why this given study aimed to collect empirical data on the linkage between psychological mindedness and the highest adaptive type of reflection on a sample of Russian testees. The sample consisted of 149 respondents aged 18 – 65. Methods exploited in the study included Psychological Mindedness Scale by H. R. Conte (adapted by M. A. Novikova and T. V. Kornilova) and Differential Test of Reflexivity by D. A. Leont’ev, et al. The obtained data have confirmed the hypothesis of a connection between psychological mindedness and the systemic reflection. A positive correlation between one of the aspects of psychological mindedness – an interest in the sphere of subjective experiences – and introspection and quasi-reflection was found. Introspection as one of ineffective forms of reflection is negatively linked to the most important parameter of psychological mindedness – subjective availability of experiences for comprehension and analysis. In the course of correlation analysis the specificity of interrelations between psychological mindedness and types of reflection in women, men and mixed-age groups was revealed. The obtained data allow for clarifying the concept of psychological mindedness and differentially carrying out further studies on mixed-age and gender groups.
Keywords
  • psychological mindedness
  • reflexivity
  • types of reflection
For citation Putilova OV, Vindeker OS, Smorkalova TL. A Study into Psychological Mindedness in Relation to Different Types of Reflection. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 276–285. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-SP06.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
References
  • 1. Asmolov AG, Shekhter ED, Chernozizov AM. Preadaptatsiya k neopredelennosti kak strategiya navigatsii razvivayushchikhsya sistem: marshruty evolyutsii [Pre-adaptation to uncertainty as a strategy for navigating developing systems: routes of evolution]. Voprosy psikhologii = Issues of psychology. 2017;4: 3–26. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Vindeker OS, Klimenskykh MV. Psikhometricheskie grani antikhrupkosti: tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti, zhiznestoikost’ i rost [Psychometric facets of antifragility: tolerance to uncertainty, resilience and growth]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = The Russian Psychological journal. 2016;13(3): 107–122. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Zotova OY. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti [Psychological security of personality]. Yekaterinburg: University for Humanities; 2018. 312 p. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Leontiev DA, et al. Razrabotka metodiki differentsial’noi diagnostiki refleksivnosti [Development of a methodology to differentially diagnose reflexivity]. In: Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie [Reflexive processes and management]: a collection of papers of 7th International symposium, 15–16, October 2009. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2009. p. 145–150. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Leontiev DA, Osin EN. Refleksiya «khoroshaya» i «durnaya»: ot ob”yasnitel’noi modeli k differentsial’noi diagnostike [A “good” and a “nasty” reflection: from an explanatory model to differential diagnostic]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. The journal of High School of Economics. 2014;11(4): 110–135. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Novikova MA, Kornilova TV. «Psikhologicheskaya razumnost’» v strukture intellektual’no-lichnostnogo potentsiala (adaptatsiya oprosnika) [Psychological mindedness in the system of intellectual and personality potential (adaptation of a questionnaire)]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological journal. 2014;35(1): 95–110. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Trifonova TA. Ontogenez cheloveka [Ontogenesis of man]. Fond znanii «Lomonosov» [Fund of knowledge “Lomonosov”]. Website. 11.02.2011. Available from: http://www.lomonosov-fund.ru/enc/ru/encyclopedia:0132877 [Accessed 16.01.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Conte HR, Ratto R, Karasu TB. The Psychological Mindedness Scale: Factor structure and relationship to outcome of psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research. 1996;5: 250–259.
  • 9. Dollinger SJ, Greening L, Tylenda B. Psychological-mindedness as “reading between the lines”: Vigilance, locus of control, and sagacious judgment. Journal of Personality. 1985;53(4): 603–625.
  • 10. Farber BA. The genesis, development, and implications of psychological mindedness in psychotherapists. Psychotherapy. 1985;22: 170–177.
  • 11. Grant AM. Rethinking Psychological Mindedness: Metacognition, Selfreflection, and Insight. Behaviour Change. 2001;18(1): 8–17.
  • 12. Hall JA. Psychological-mindedness: A conceptual model. American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1992;46(1): 131–140.
  • 13. Zinchenko YP, Zotova OY. Osnovaniya bezopasnosti cheloveka I obshestva [The bases of the security of an individual and society]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy to Retrain and Improve the Qualifications of Educators; 2010.
  • 14. Wolitzky DL, Reuben R. Psychological-mindedness. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1974;30: 26–30.
Funding
Submitted 10.07.2019
Accepted 12.08.2019