scientific conference of lau
Title On Power of Visual Images in the Era of New Media
Author Alla V. Drozdova
About the author
DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-J02
Section Journalism, Advertising & Public Relations
Year Index UDK 130.2:316.77 Pages 305–312
Abstract The idea of the “visual turn” and power of images is not a feature of the contemporary era; it has emerged in the history of culture multiple times, especially when new reproduction technologies or new options of images arose. The novelty of the contemporary situation has to do not only with quantitative proliferation of images and the expanding subject field of the visual but also with the fact that the flow of visual images transmitted from various mobile screens shaped a specific online mediatized reality. Contemporary visual images that have become a part of the cultural media industry make an impact on the subject viewer and, in this sense, wield power over our visual experience, registering the social changes occurring in the contemporary culture. Technical means of visualization cause disappearance of the image’s aural property, automation of perception and industrialization of vision, mediated by the image’s digital processing. It is such digital images that build our mundanity, imperiously imposing the behaviors and social roles that a person identifies with. Digital images indicate social strategies of the visible that remove certain phenomena or objects from or return them to the field of the social vision, creating or breaking image-related taboos. Additionally, representation of reality is superseded in the Internet environment by online “public representation” that drastically changes the positions of the perceived and the perceiver. Methods and approaches of visual studies as an interdisciplinary field of humanities knowledge were applied to identify specific features of contemporary visual culture and analyze visual images’ imperious influence on individual’s modes of vision and perception, their inhabited world and ways of identification.
  • visual image
  • visual turn
  • visual culture
  • visual studies
  • media reality
  • technical reproducibility
  • representation
  • public presentation
For citation Drozdova AV. On Power of Visual Images in the Era of New Media. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientificpractical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 305–312. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-J02.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
  • 1. Aronson O, Petrovskaya Е. Chto ostaetsya ot iskusstva [What is Left from Art]. Moscow: Institute of Contemporary Art Issues; 2014. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Bachmann-Medic D. Kul’turnye povoroty. Novye orientiry v naukakh o kul’ture [Cultural Turns. New Benchmarks in Cultural Studies]. Moscow: New Literary Review; 2017. 504 p. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Benjamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoi vosproizvodimosti [The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction]. Selected Essays. Moscow: Medium; 1996. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Berger J. Iskusstvo videt’ [Ways of Seeing]. Saint Petersburg: Klaudberri; 2018. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Boytsova OY. Lyubitel’skie foto: vizual’naya kul’tura povsednevnosti [Amateur Photos: Visual Culture of Mundanity]. Saint Petersburg: European University in Saint Petersburg Press; 2013. 266 p. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Bulgakovа О. Telo media i medial’naya bestelesnost’ [Media’s Body and Media’s Incorporeity]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie = New Literary Review. 2012;5. Available from: [Accessed 17.04.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Virilio P. Mashina zreniya [Machine of Vision]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 2004. 140 p. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Кorelina О. Pomnite yaitso, kotoroe ustanovilo rekord po laikam v instagrame? Zhurnalisty nashli tekh, kto vse eto pridumal [Remember the Egg that Set the Record in Instagram Likes? Journalists Found the People Behind it]. Meduza. Website. 04.02.2019. Available from: [Accessed 10.04.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 9. Lovink G. Kriticheskaya teoriya interneta [Critical Theory of Internet]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2019. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  • 10. Mazur NN. (ed.) Mir obrazov. Obrazy mira [World of Images. Images of the World]: Corpus of Visual Culture Studies. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo; 2018. 544 p. (In Russ.).
  • 11. Mitchell WJ. Ikonologiya. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologiya [Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology]. Moscow: Kabinetnyi uchenyi; 2017. (In Russ.).
  • 12. Nabieva А. Oleg Aronson: «My zhivem v mire printsipial’no lozhnykh obrazov» [Oleg Aronson: “We are Living in a World of Fundamentally False Images”]. Korydor. Website. 17.06.2015. Available from: [Accessed 15.04.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 13. Hesmondhalgh D. Kul’turnye industrii [The Cultural Industries]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Press; 2018. 456 p. (In Russ.).
  • 14. Boehm G. Die Wiederkehr der Bilder. In: Boehm G. (Hg.) Was ist ein Bild? Munchen; 1994. s. 11–38.
  • 15. Kester GH. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Oakland, CA: University of California Press Books; 2013. 264 p.
  • 16. Mitchell WJT. Picture Theory. Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. p. 3–34.
  • 17. Foster H. (ed.) Vision and Visuality (Discussions in Contemporary Culture – 2). Seattle: Bay Press; 1988.
  • 18. Walker JA. Visual Culture and Visual Culture Studies. Art Book. 1998;5(1): 14.
Submitted 08.08.2019
Accepted 10.09.2019