scientific conference of lau
Title Post-Colonial and Spatial Turns in Theory of Culture: Discourse of “Subordinate” Localities
Author Svetlana N. Ovodova
About the author
DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-PC03
Section Philosophy & Culturology
Year Index UDK 008:316.72 Pages 49–58
Abstract The paper analyzes the discourse on the global and the local in social sciences and humanities. Models of understanding the global are identified and described. This research was triggered by criticism of the modern and the model of the global understood within the modern context and realized in post-modern, post-post-modern, as well as research programs on postcolonial studies, trauma studies and decolonial turn. The paper explores methodology opportunities of applying spatial, post-colonial and de-colonial turns to analyzing representations of local cultures and the local experience. “The local” has to submit to global trends not to be marginal; however, the need to fit itself into the global context neutralizes the regional culture’s distinctiveness. The research resulted in 3 models of understanding the global proposed by the author. Firstly, the global can be understood as scaling values and conventions of a single culture that is recognized as dominant in relation to all other cultures, while the latter are perceived as insignificant localities falling behind in development (the conventional “imperial” model of the global). Secondly, the model of the global can be understood as “the united universal” where a model of a single world is created, bringing together various cultures and neutralizing differences between them. Thirdly, the global can be understood as a space where various localities exist simultaneously, and each of them preserves its uniqueness. The article proposes the notion of a transit culture aligned with identities recognized within the decolonial turn. Differences between identities shaped within the transit culture and hybrid identities are distinguished.
  • culture
  • post-colonial turn
  • space
  • spatial turn
  • locality
  • the global
For citation Ovodova SN. Post-Colonial and Spatial Turns in Theory of Culture: Discourse of “Subordinate” Localities. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 49–58. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-PC03.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
  • 1. Bhabha H. DissemiNatsiya: vremya, povestvovanie i kraya sovremennoi natsii [DissemiNation: Time, Narrative and the Margins of the Modern Nation]. Sinii divan = Blue Sofa. 2005;6: 68–118. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Bhabha H. Mestonakhozhdenie kul’tury [The Location of Culture]. Perekrestki: zhurnal issledovanii vostochnoevropeiskogo prigranich’ya = Crossroads: Journal of East European Border zone Studies. 2005;3-4: 161–191. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Derrida J. Disseminatsii [Dissemination]. Yekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; 2007. 608 p. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Castro EV. Kannibal’skie metafiziki. Rubezhi poststrukturnoi antropologii [Cannibal Metaphysics. For a Post-Structural Anthropology]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2017. 200 p. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Makogon TI. «Prostranstvennyi povorot» i vozmozhnost’ novatsionnykh podkhodov v sotsial’no-filosofskom diskurse [“Spatial Turn” and the Opportunity of Novel Approaches in Social and Philosophical Discourse]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta = Tomsk Polytechnic University News. 2012;321(6): 167–172. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Mitchell Т. Stsena «sovremennosti» [The Stage of Modernity]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas = Emergency Reserve. 2014;6(98). Available from: [Accessed 03.02.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Nora P. Problematika mest pamyati [Problems of Memory Spaces]. In: Nora P, Ozuf M, Pyuimezh Zh, Vino M. Frantsiya-pamyat’ [France – Memory]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press; 1999. p. 17–50. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Ovodova SN. Transformatsiya ponimaniya idei «Drugogo» v teorii i filosofii kul’tury kak otrazhenie diskursa «global’nogo» i «lokal’nogo» [Transformation of Understanding the Idea of “Other” in Theory and Philosophy of Culture as a Reflection of the Discourse of “The Global” and “The Local”]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Omsk University Bulletin. 2019;1: 118–121. (In Russ.).
  • 9. Auger M. Ne-mesta. Vvedenie v antropologiyu gipermoderna [Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity]. Moscow: New Literary Review; 2017. 136 p. (In Russ.).
  • 10. Tlostanova MV. Dekolonial’nost’ znaniya i preodolenie distsiplinarnogo dekadansa [Decoloniality of Knowledge and Overcoming Disciplinary Decadence]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2011;27(1): 84–100. (In Russ.).
  • 11. Tlostanova MV. Dekolonial’nye gendernye epistemologii [Decolonial Gender Epistemologies]. Moscow: Maska; 2009. 386 p. (In Russ.).
  • 12. Tlostanova MV. Postkolonial’naya teoriya, dekolonial’nyi vybor i osvobozhdenie estezisa [Post-Colonial Theory, Decolonial Choice and Freeing the Aesthesis]. Chelovek i kul’tura = Individual and Culture. 2012;1: 1–64. Available from: [Accessed 01.02.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 13. Foucault M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdenie tyur’my [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2016. 416 p. (In Russ.).
  • 14. Bhabha HK. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge Classics; 2004. 440 p.
  • 15. Mignolo WD. Epistemic Disobedience and the Decolonial Option: A Manifesto. Transmodernity. 2011;1(2): 44–66.
  • 16. Spivak GC. Can the Subaltern Speak? In: Williams P, Chrisman L. Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press; 1994. p. 66–111.
  • 17. Tuck E, McKenzie M, McCoy K. Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspective on place and environmental education research. Environmental education research. 2014;20(1): 1–23.
Funding The research was supported by Presidential Grant: project MK-6373.2018.6
Submitted 01.07.2019
Accepted 20.08.2019