scientific conference of lau
Title Phenomenological Approach to Consumption Society Analysis: E. Husserl and J. Baudrillard
Author Pavel L. Zaytsev
About the author
DOI 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-PC05
Section Philosophy & Culturology
Year Index UDK 165.62:316 Pages 68–74
Abstract The notion of “consumption society” was introduced by J. Baudrillard in 1970, when he published the book of this name, so well-loved by researchers. Today, “impression society” or “experience consumption society” is getting more and more widespread along with the “consumption society” concept. Consumption of impressions means a certain industry producing impressions. This paper aims to identify the link between J. Baudrillard’s concept of “consumption society” and key explanatory concepts in the sphere of public production and consumption that existed in his time. The paper poses and answers the question of potential sources of Baudrillard’s research approach. It is argued that, despite his “leftist” aesthetics, J. Baudrillard was pretty far from C. Marx. His view of the purpose of consumer value is explained from E. Husserl’s perspective of the phenomenological methodology. We find attention to the context of contemporary economic ties in works by G. Simmel, specifically, in his The Metropolis and Mental Life. The paper ends with the conclusion that while C. Marx’s contemporary society, with all the significance of production processes, with its obvious commodity orientation and large-scale crises caused by commodities overproduction, still included lacunae not directly associated with the world of capital – family, religion, ethnicity, lifestyle – the “consumption society” seizes these, too.
  • J. Baudrillard
  • E. Husserl
  • consumption society
  • differentiation
  • recognition
For citation Zaytsev PL. Phenomenological Approach to Consumption Society Analysis: E. Husserl and J. Baudrillard. In: Zaks LA, Semitko AP, Mitsek SA, et al. (еds.) Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019). Yekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University – University for Humanities; 2019. p. 68–74. Available from: doi:10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-PC05.
License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article language russian
  • 1. Baudrillard J. Obshchestvo potrebleniya: ego mify i struktury [The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures]. Moscow: Respublika; 2006. Available from: [Accessed 01.01.2019]. (In Russ.).
  • 2. Husserl E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kn. pervaya : Obshchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu [Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology]. Moscow: Academic Project; 2009. 489 p. (In Russ.).
  • 3. Zaks LA. Prostranstvo i kul’tura. Kontsept granitsy [Space and Culture. Concept of Border]. In: Zaytsev PL, Zaks LA. (eds.) Sotsial’nye i kul’turnye protsessy v rossiiskom prigranich’e [Social and Cultural Processes in Russian Trans-Border Region]: proceedings of All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Attendance. Yekaterinburg: University for Humanities; 2017. p. 12–27. (In Russ.).
  • 4. Zaks LA. Sovremennaya revolyutsiya / evolyutsiya kul’tury i formirovanie kul’turotsentristskoi paradigmy soznaniya (na primere filosofii i sotsiogumanitarnykh nauk) [Contemporary Revolution / Evolution of Culture and Emergence of Culture-Centric Paradigm of Conscience (Exemplified by Philosophy, Social Sciences and Humanities)]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 3 : Obshchestvennye nauki = Ural Federal University News. Series 3: Social Sciences. 2019;14(1): 154–166. (In Russ.).
  • 5. Simmel G. Bol’shie goroda i dukhovnaya zhizn’ [The Metropolis and Mental Life]. Logos = Logos. 2002;3(34): 23–34. (In Russ.).
  • 6. Kuparashvili MD, Vetrov SA. Uchenie Marksa vsesil’no, potomu chto ono verno [Marx’ Teaching is Omnipotent Because it is Correct]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Omsk University Bulletin. 2018;23(4): 126–131. (In Russ.).
  • 7. Marx C, Engels F. Sochineniya. T. 13 (yanvar’ 1859 – fevral’ 1860) [Works. Vol. 13 (January 1859 – February 1860)]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Political Literature Publishing House; 1959. 771 p. (In Russ.).
  • 8. Ovodova SN. Slovo i vizual’nyi obraz v sovremennoi kul’ture [Word and Visual Image in Contemporary Culture]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Omsk University Bulletin. 2013;1(67): 151–153. (In Russ.).
  • 9. Ovodova SN. Proektirovanie antropokul’turnoi real’nosti posredstvom dizaina [Engineering Anthropo-Cultural Reality Through Design]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Omsk University Bulletin. 2014;1(71): 136–142. (In Russ.).
  • 10. Ovodova SN, Chupin RI. «X, Y-matritsy» v urbanisticheskom diskurse lokal’nykh gorodskikh soobshchestv [X, Y Matrices in Urbanism Discourse of Local Urban Communities]. In: Zaytsev PL, et al. (eds.) Vizual’nye obrazy sovremennoi kul’tury. Izuchaya lokal’nost’: fundamenal’nye skhemy i issledovatel’skie praktiki [Visual Images of Contemporary Culture. Studying Locality: Fundamental Patterns and Research Practices]: Proceedings of the VII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Omsk: Omsk University Press; 2018. p. 21–28. (In Russ.).
  • 11. Schulze G. Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verl.; 1992. p. 765.
Submitted 01.07.2019
Accepted 20.08.2019